StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
SES.SI$0.04+2.78%
Fair $0.04+0.0%

SES.SI

Shanaya Limited

Industrials / Waste ManagementSES

$0.04

+0.00 (+2.78%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.04Fund rank 20/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 31/D
F-Score: 6/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 14%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $941000.00 · quality 25.7/100

Data gap 20/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 8/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

31/100

D

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 0.2%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · SES.SILocal privado en este navegador · Shanaya Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$9M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

6.8x

↓

ROE

0.2%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

1.91

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

SES.SI price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.037Periodo -99.7%
Fair value: $0.037

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+1.2%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-3.4%

FCF / Net income

-39.14x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $8.0M · net income $7000.0 · FCF $-274000.0

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

-10.2%+0.7% pts

Net margin

0.1%+18.6% pts

FCF margin

-3.4%+4.9% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$8.0M$8.0M$7.7M$8.0M$7.7M
Net Income$7000.00$7000.00$-1.2M$-1.1M$-1.4M
EBITDA$2.2M$2.2M$1.2M$1.4M$969000.00
EPS———-0.01-0.01
Operating Margin-10.2%-10.2%-7.0%-6.1%-10.9%
Net Margin0.1%0.1%-15.8%-13.6%-18.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.911.912.724.563.51
Current Ratio1.371.37———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-274000.00$-274000.00$1.0M$941000.00$-645000.00
Returns
ROE0.2%0.2%-27.7%-35.2%-34.2%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA6.846.8416.3314.1323.64
P/B1.811.812.262.262.43
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth3.4%3.4%-3.1%3.4%—
EPS Growth———24.6%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +5.7%

Total return

+5.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

n/d → n/d

Residual

+5.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+5.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.