StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
SHANTIGOLD.NS$229.84+0.13%
Fair $229.84+0.0%

SHANTIGOLD.NS

SHANTIGOLD.NS

Consumer Cyclical / Luxury GoodsNSE

$229.84

+0.28 (+0.13%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $229.84Fund rank 24/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 57/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-234.2M · quality 43.7/100

Data gap 24/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 12/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

57/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · SHANTIGOLD.NSLocal privado en este navegador · SHANTIGOLD.NS
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$16.6B

P/E

10.8x

↓

EV/EBITDA

9.0x

↓

ROE

23.4%

↑

Gross Margin

10.9%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.36

↓
52-Week Range$230
$155$274

TradingView lightweight chart

SHANTIGOLD.NS price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $220.96Periodo -3.7%
Fair value: $229.84

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+43.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-13.2%

FCF / Net income

-1.90x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $20.19B · net income $1.40B · FCF $-2.67B

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

10.9%+3.1% pts

Operating margin

9.6%+3.6% pts

Net margin

6.9%+4.0% pts

FCF margin

-13.2%-11.9% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$20.19B$20.19B$11.06B$7.11B$6.79B
Net Income$1.40B$1.40B$541.0M$268.7M$198.2M
EBITDA$2.09B$2.09B$959.8M$529.8M$453.3M
EPS——7.503.732.75
Gross Margin10.9%10.9%9.5%8.7%7.8%
Operating Margin9.6%9.6%7.6%6.6%5.9%
Net Margin6.9%6.9%4.9%3.8%2.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.360.361.602.182.37
Current Ratio3.313.31———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-2.67B$-2.67B$-218.9M$-234.2M$-87.5M
Returns
ROE23.4%23.4%35.5%27.8%28.4%
Valuation
P/E10.8410.84———
EV/EBITDA8.968.96———
P/B2.772.77———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth82.5%82.5%55.5%4.7%—
EPS Growth——101.4%35.6%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -3.7%

Total return

-3.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

7.50 → n/d

Residual

-3.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-3.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.