StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
SHPLPUNE.BO$798.80-1.93%
Fair $798.80+0.0%

SHPLPUNE.BO

Sayaji Hotels (Pune) Limited

Consumer Cyclical / LodgingBSE

$798.80

-15.75 (-1.93%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $798.80Fund rank 34/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 38/D
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $69.3M · quality 65.7/100

Data gap 34/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 61/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

38/100

D

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 0unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · SHPLPUNE.BOLocal privado en este navegador · Sayaji Hotels (Pune) Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2.4B

P/E

12.5x

↓

EV/EBITDA

9.5x

↑

ROE

20.7%

↑

Gross Margin

71.6%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.00

↓
52-Week Range$799
$664$1100

TradingView lightweight chart

SHPLPUNE.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $798.80Periodo +773.5%
Fair value: $798.80

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2025 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+8.1%

FCF CAGR

-55.6%

FCF margin

2.3%

FCF / Net income

0.10x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $767.6M · net income $169.5M · FCF $17.7M

2023-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

71.6%-0.7% pts

Operating margin

29.7%+0.3% pts

Net margin

22.1%+1.0% pts

FCF margin

2.3%-11.3% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$767.6M$767.6M$704.7M$656.8M
Net Income$169.5M$169.5M$165.8M$138.1M
EBITDA$254.8M$254.8M$247.7M$228.9M
EPS55.6355.6354.4145.34
Gross Margin71.6%71.6%71.2%72.3%
Operating Margin29.7%29.7%31.0%29.5%
Net Margin22.1%22.1%23.5%21.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.000.000.030.17
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$17.7M$17.7M$69.3M$89.6M
Returns
ROE20.7%20.7%25.5%28.5%
Valuation
P/E12.5212.527.31—
EV/EBITDA9.469.464.88—
P/B2.972.971.87—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth8.9%8.9%7.3%—
EPS Growth2.2%2.2%20.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

8.4%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$70.88

Spread vs growth

-6.2%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

9.0%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$85.77

Spread vs growth

-6.8%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

9.5%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$138.13

Spread vs growth

-7.3%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -7.0%

Total return

-7.0%

Start / end P/E

15.8x → 14.4x

EPS bridge

54.41 → 55.63

Residual

-0.2%

EPS growth+2.2%
Multiple rerating-9.1%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-0.2%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.