StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
SNV.V$0.04+0.00%
Fair $0.04+0.0%

SNV.V

Sonoro Energy Ltd.

Energy / Oil & Gas E&PTSXV

$0.04

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.04Fund rank 24/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 8/F
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-1.1M · quality 47.3/100

Data gap 24/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 27/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

8/100

F

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. ROE is 1.2%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · SNV.VLocal privado en este navegador · Sonoro Energy Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$8M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

115.2%

↑

Gross Margin

90.3%

↑

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

SNV.V price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.040Periodo -100.0%
Fair value: $0.035

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-2247.1%

FCF / Net income

0.73x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $34431.0 · net income $-1.1M · FCF $-773687.0

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

90.3%— pts

Operating margin

-2713.1%— pts

Net margin

-3073.5%— pts

FCF margin

-2247.1%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$34431.00$34431.00$346355.00——
Net Income$-1.1M$-1.1M$-4.5M$3.9M$-1.4M
EBITDA$-1.0M$-1.0M$-4.3M$4.2M$-161335.00
EPS——-0.020.02-0.01
Gross Margin90.3%90.3%34.9%——
Operating Margin-2713.1%-2713.1%-434.8%——
Net Margin-3073.5%-3073.5%-1294.0%——
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity——-0.550.51-0.38
Current Ratio0.150.15———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-773687.00$-773687.00$-1.1M$-3.2M$-99464.00
Returns
ROE115.2%115.2%354.2%288.2%25.8%
Valuation
P/E———10.00—
EV/EBITDA———9.33—
P/B———28.91—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-90.1%-90.1%———
EPS Growth——-195.2%290.9%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -42.9%

Total return

-42.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.02 → n/d

Residual

-42.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-42.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.