StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
SOLARWORLD.BO$204.30+1.82%
Fair $204.30+0.0%

SOLARWORLD.BO

SOLARWORLD.BO

Technology / SolarBSE

$204.30

+3.65 (+1.82%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $204.30Fund rank 24/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 52/C
F-Score: 2/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 17%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-979.8M · quality 42.3/100

Data gap 24/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 9/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

52/100

C

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · SOLARWORLD.BOLocal privado en este navegador · SOLARWORLD.BO
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$17.7B

P/E

13.7x

↓

EV/EBITDA

10.7x

↓

ROE

14.2%

↑

Gross Margin

14.1%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.30

↑
52-Week Range$204
$139$350

TradingView lightweight chart

SOLARWORLD.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $204.30Periodo -35.7%
Fair value: $204.30

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+80.9%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-7.9%

FCF / Net income

-0.90x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $13.76B · net income $1.20B · FCF $-1.08B

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

14.1%+3.3% pts

Operating margin

10.4%+1.1% pts

Net margin

8.8%+2.4% pts

FCF margin

-7.9%-4.4% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$13.76B$13.76B$5.45B$5.01B$2.32B
Net Income$1.20B$1.20B$770.5M$516.9M$148.4M
EBITDA$1.87B$1.87B$1.13B$749.3M$246.5M
EPS——8.895.96—
Gross Margin14.1%14.1%27.3%15.1%10.8%
Operating Margin10.4%10.4%20.0%14.1%9.2%
Net Margin8.8%8.8%14.1%10.3%6.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.300.300.370.832.95
Current Ratio1.881.88———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-1.08B$-1.08B$-979.8M$69.9M$-81.2M
Returns
ROE14.2%14.2%24.9%70.2%67.7%
Valuation
P/E13.6713.67———
EV/EBITDA10.7210.72———
P/B2.092.09———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth152.6%152.6%8.8%115.4%—
EPS Growth——49.1%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -35.7%

Total return

-35.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

8.89 → n/d

Residual

-35.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-35.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.