StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
SPL.AX$0.76+4.14%
Fair $0.76+0.0%

SPL.AX

SPL.AX

Healthcare / BiotechnologyASX

$0.76

+0.03 (+4.14%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.76Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 34/D
F-Score: 0/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 23%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-7.1M · quality 67.3/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 32/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

34/100

D

Piotroski

0/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific biotech pipeline model required: targets are disabled until product, probability, peak-sales and cash-runway data exists. ROE is -52.6%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · SPL.AXLocal privado en este navegador · SPL.AX
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$0

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-52.6%

↓

Gross Margin

75.1%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.13

↓
52-Week Range$1
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

SPL.AX price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.755Periodo -11.2%
Fair value: $0.755

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+1.6%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-138.5%

FCF / Net income

0.68x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $4.9M · net income $-10.0M · FCF $-6.8M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

75.1%+34.4% pts

Operating margin

-244.3%+134.0% pts

Net margin

-203.4%+141.6% pts

FCF margin

-138.5%+160.5% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$4.9M$4.9M$8.3M$2.9M$4.7M
Net Income$-10.0M$-10.0M$-8.2M$-15.6M$-16.2M
EBITDA$-10.9M$-10.9M$-9.6M$-17.0M$-16.6M
EPS-0.02-0.02-0.02-0.04-0.04
Gross Margin75.1%75.1%92.4%61.9%40.7%
Operating Margin-244.3%-244.3%-129.7%-620.5%-378.3%
Net Margin-203.4%-203.4%-98.5%-532.1%-345.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.130.130.130.240.17
Current Ratio5.265.26———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-6.8M$-6.8M$-7.1M$-14.2M$-14.0M
Returns
ROE-52.6%-52.6%-29.0%-44.9%-33.4%
Valuation
P/B16.5816.581.453.765.84
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-40.7%-40.7%182.0%-37.2%—
EPS Growth-19.5%-19.5%50.0%0.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +703.2%

Total return

+703.2%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.02 → -0.02

Residual

+703.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+703.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.