StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
SPT6.F$26.40-0.79%
Fair $26.40+0.0%

SPT6.F

Beta Systems Software Aktiengesellschaft

Technology / Software - InfrastructureFrankfurt

$26.40

-0.20 (-0.79%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $26.40Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 33/D
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 26% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $11497.00 · quality 46.0/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 47/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

33/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -1.9%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · SPT6.FLocal privado en este navegador · Beta Systems Software Aktiengesellschaft
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$166M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-186.9%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$26
$15$27

TradingView lightweight chart

SPT6.F price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $25.20Periodo +6017.5%
Fair value: $26.40

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2025 · 4 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+86.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

0.0%

FCF / Net income

-0.00x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $29.1M · net income $-58.5M · FCF $11497.0

2021-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

-200.7%-179.5% pts

FCF margin

0.0%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$29.1M$29.1M$-13.3M$-38.5M$2.4M
Net Income$-58.5M$-58.5M$-14.7M$-40.4M$-507540.43
EPS-9.31-9.31-4.19-11.49-0.26
Net Margin-200.7%-200.7%110.6%105.0%-21.2%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity——0.030.030.06
Current Ratio133.12133.12———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$11497.00$11497.00———
Returns
ROE-186.9%-186.9%-8.5%-26.6%-0.4%
Valuation
P/B5.305.300.570.810.87
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth318.7%318.7%65.4%-1708.3%—
EPS Growth-122.2%-122.2%63.5%-4319.2%—
Dividend Yield0.2%0.2%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +43.4%

Total return

+43.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-4.19 → -9.31

Residual

+43.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.2%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+43.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.