Consumer Cyclical / Specialty RetailNasdaqGS
$1.38
+0.06 (+4.55%)
FCF base 3Y
n/d
n/d CAGR · yield n/d
FCF base 5Y
n/d
n/d base · n/d expected
Precio de entrada
n/d
MOS 34% · confianza 18%
FCF escenarios
weak_data · normalized FCF $8.9M · quality 19.7/100
Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.
SA Score
16/100
F
Piotroski
3/9
balance/quality
Valuation
50/100
+0.0% upside
5Y CAGR
+0.0%
50/100
Data QA
20/100
SEC 0%
Sin guardar todavía.
Market Cap
$54M
P/E
N/A
•EV/EBITDA
287.0x
↑ROE
-26.5%
↓Gross Margin
30.9%
↑Debt/Equity
2.26
↑TradingView lightweight chart
Absolute Values (Left Axis)
Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)
Financial statement dashboard
2013–2026 · 13 años de histórico normalizado
Revenue CAGR
+6.6%
FCF CAGR
—
FCF margin
0.7%
FCF / Net income
-0.18x
Latest source
Provider fallback
Margin decomposition
Último año: revenue $1.21B · net income $-50.1M · FCF $8.9M
Gross margin
Operating margin
Net margin
FCF margin
| Metric | TTM | 2026 | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income Statement | |||||||||||||||
| Revenue | $1.21B | $1.21B | $1.20B | $1.29B | $1.40B | $1.51B | $1.45B | $886.4M | $849.1M | $809.7M | $780.0M | $706.8M | $639.9M | $643.2M | $526.9M |
| Net Income | $-50.1M | $-50.1M | $-33.1M | $-29.0M | $40.5M | $108.5M | $91.4M | $20.2M | $23.8M | $17.7M | $29.7M | $27.8M | $13.8M | $21.8M | $28.1M |
| EBITDA | $1.7M | $1.7M | $21.6M | $13.7M | $89.8M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS | -1.30 | -1.30 | -0.87 | -0.77 | 1.00 | 2.44 | 2.06 | 0.46 | 0.55 | 0.42 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.34 | 0.66 | 0.84 |
| Gross Margin | 30.9% | 30.9% | 30.9% | 29.8% | 32.9% | 32.6% | 32.8% | 33.5% | 33.6% | 33.8% | 33.7% | 33.7% | 33.6% | 32.2% | 30.9% |
| Operating Margin | -1.2% | -1.2% | -1.2% | -1.0% | 4.7% | 6.0% | 8.5% | 3.8% | 5.2% | 5.8% | 7.8% | 8.4% | 7.0% | 9.3% | 10.1% |
| Net Margin | -4.1% | -4.1% | -2.8% | -2.3% | 2.9% | 7.2% | 6.3% | 2.3% | 2.8% | 2.2% | 3.8% | 3.9% | 2.2% | 3.4% | 5.3% |
| Balance Sheet | |||||||||||||||
| Debt/Equity | 2.26 | 2.26 | 1.93 | 1.82 | 1.34 | — | — | 0.22 | 0.35 | 2.66 | 4.46 | -71.07 | -5.00 | -1.89 | — |
| Current Ratio | 1.36 | 1.36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Cash Flow | |||||||||||||||
| Free Cash Flow | $8.9M | $8.9M | $19.6M | $-27.6M | $-16.7M | $-75.1M | $219.1M | $47.5M | $14.2M | $-10.4M | $-23.9M | $1.5M | — | — | — |
| Returns | |||||||||||||||
| ROE | -26.5% | -26.5% | -14.0% | -11.0% | 13.8% | 34.5% | 44.6% | 18.3% | 30.2% | 35.6% | 98.9% | -1348.8% | -44.0% | -18.0% | -67.1% |
| Valuation | |||||||||||||||
| P/E | — | — | — | — | 9.98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV/EBITDA | 287.02 | 287.02 | 24.10 | 45.15 | 8.88 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.52 | 1.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Growth & Yield | |||||||||||||||
| Revenue Growth | 1.0% | 1.0% | -7.0% | -8.0% | — | 3.7% | 63.8% | 4.4% | 4.9% | 3.8% | 10.4% | 10.5% | -0.5% | 22.1% | — |
| EPS Growth | -49.4% | -49.4% | -13.0% | -177.0% | — | 18.4% | 347.8% | -16.4% | 31.0% | -40.0% | 6.1% | 94.1% | -48.5% | -21.4% | — |
Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)
Margins (%)
Returns (%)
Leverage & Liquidity
Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.
Total return
-27.0%
Start / end P/E
n/dx → n/dx
EPS bridge
-0.87 → -1.30
Residual
-27.0%
EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.
Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.