StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
SPZ.V$0.06+10.00%
Fair $0.06+0.0%

SPZ.V

SuperBuzz Inc.

Technology / Software - ApplicationTSXV

$0.06

+0.00 (+10.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.06Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 18/F
F-Score: 2/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 22%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-935000.00 · quality 63.0/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 27/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

18/100

F

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 1.1%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · SPZ.VLocal privado en este navegador · SuperBuzz Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

106.2%

↑

Gross Margin

100.0%

↑

Debt/Equity

-0.60

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

SPZ.V price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.055Periodo -87.5%
Fair value: $0.055

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-8383.3%

FCF / Net income

0.94x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $18000.0 · net income $-1.6M · FCF $-1.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

100.0%— pts

Operating margin

-7877.8%— pts

Net margin

-8944.4%— pts

FCF margin

-8383.3%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$18000.00$18000.00$3000.00$8000.00—
Net Income$-1.6M$-1.6M$-778000.00$-1.3M$-3.9M
EBITDA$-1.5M$-1.5M$-724000.00$-1.2M$-3.8M
EPS——-0.05-0.13-0.49
Gross Margin100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%—
Operating Margin-7877.8%-7877.8%-34600.0%-14087.5%—
Net Margin-8944.4%-8944.4%-25933.3%-16050.0%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-0.60-0.60-0.85-0.26-0.80
Current Ratio0.010.01———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-1.5M$-1.5M$-935000.00$-557000.00$-1.7M
Returns
ROE106.2%106.2%53.2%107.4%1310.5%
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth500.0%500.0%-62.5%——
EPS Growth——59.1%73.2%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -54.2%

Total return

-54.2%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.05 → n/d

Residual

-54.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-54.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.