StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
SSDL.NS$59.24-0.02%
Fair $59.24+0.0%

SSDL.NS

SSDL.NS

Consumer Cyclical / Apparel RetailNSE

$59.24

-0.01 (-0.02%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $59.24Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 41/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-26.3M · quality 43.7/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 13/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

41/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · SSDL.NSLocal privado en este navegador · SSDL.NS
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2.3B

P/E

8.7x

↓

EV/EBITDA

4.6x

↓

ROE

17.2%

↑

Gross Margin

11.4%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.09

↓
52-Week Range$59
$46$108

TradingView lightweight chart

SSDL.NS price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $61.33Periodo -69.9%
Fair value: $59.24

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+3.6%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-0.4%

FCF / Net income

-0.09x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $6.04B · net income $305.8M · FCF $-26.3M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

11.4%+3.0% pts

Operating margin

6.5%+2.7% pts

Net margin

5.1%+2.8% pts

FCF margin

-0.4%+7.9% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$6.04B$6.04B$6.02B$5.92B$5.43B
Net Income$305.8M$305.8M$295.3M$229.7M$123.1M
EBITDA$443.9M$443.9M$428.6M$357.2M$216.0M
EPS7.727.727.465.803.11
Gross Margin11.4%11.4%11.2%10.4%8.4%
Operating Margin6.5%6.5%6.6%5.7%3.8%
Net Margin5.1%5.1%4.9%3.9%2.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.090.090.671.175.37
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-26.3M$-26.3M$-94.9M$343.2M$-450.0M
Returns
ROE17.2%17.2%45.5%64.9%99.2%
Valuation
P/E8.678.67———
EV/EBITDA4.584.58———
P/B1.321.32———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth0.3%0.3%1.6%9.1%—
EPS Growth3.5%3.5%28.5%86.7%—
Dividend Yield6.2%6.2%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-12.0%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$5.26

Spread vs growth

15.6%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

-3.8%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$6.36

Spread vs growth

7.3%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

2.9%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$10.24

Spread vs growth

0.7%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -29.7%

Total return

-29.7%

Start / end P/E

12.8x → 7.9x

EPS bridge

7.46 → 7.72

Residual

-1.3%

EPS growth+3.5%
Multiple rerating-38.1%
Dividend+6.2%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-1.3%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.