StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
STANBIK.BO$33.00+0.00%
Fair $33.00+0.0%

STANBIK.BO

Stanbik Agro Limited

Consumer Defensive / Farm ProductsBSE

$33.00

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $33.00Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 50/C
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 16%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-1.8M · quality 44.3/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 14/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

50/100

C

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 0unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · STANBIK.BOLocal privado en este navegador · Stanbik Agro Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$440M

P/E

11.7x

↓

EV/EBITDA

9.6x

↑

ROE

22.3%

↑

Gross Margin

10.4%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.01

↓
52-Week Range$33
$28$35

TradingView lightweight chart

STANBIK.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $33.00Periodo -1.0%
Fair value: $33.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2025 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+62.1%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-18.6%

FCF / Net income

-2.62x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $524.9M · net income $37.4M · FCF $-97.8M

2023-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

10.4%+4.8% pts

Operating margin

8.7%+3.2% pts

Net margin

7.1%+2.0% pts

FCF margin

-18.6%-18.6% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$524.9M$524.9M$265.5M$199.6M
Net Income$37.4M$37.4M$18.5M$10.2M
EBITDA$45.8M$45.8M$21.2M$10.9M
EPS2.812.811.390.76
Gross Margin10.4%10.4%8.8%5.6%
Operating Margin8.7%8.7%8.0%5.4%
Net Margin7.1%7.1%7.0%5.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.010.010.11—
Current Ratio47.9747.97——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-97.8M$-97.8M$-1.8M$17000.00
Returns
ROE22.3%22.3%64.2%98.3%
Valuation
P/E11.7411.74——
EV/EBITDA9.569.56——
P/B2.632.63——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth97.7%97.7%33.0%—
EPS Growth102.0%102.0%82.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

1.4%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$2.93

Spread vs growth

100.6%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

4.8%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$3.54

Spread vs growth

97.2%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

7.4%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$5.71

Spread vs growth

94.7%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -1.0%

Total return

-1.0%

Start / end P/E

24.0x → 11.8x

EPS bridge

1.39 → 2.81

Residual

-52.0%

EPS growth+102.0%
Multiple rerating-51.0%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-52.0%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.