StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
STG.TA$4585.00-3.09%
Fair $4585.00+0.0%

STG.TA

STG International Ltd.

Technology / Electronics & Computer DistributionTel Aviv

$4585.00

-146.00 (-3.09%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $4585.00Fund rank 39/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 62/B
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 22% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $22.8M · quality 85.3/100

Data gap 39/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 89/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

62/100

B

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 0unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · STG.TALocal privado en este navegador · STG International Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$220M

P/E

19.4x

↓

EV/EBITDA

961.9x

↑

ROE

7.4%

↑

Gross Margin

29.8%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.05

↓
52-Week Range$4585
$47$5500

TradingView lightweight chart

STG.TA price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $4,585Periodo +57212.5%
Fair value: $4,585

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2025 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+3.7%

FCF CAGR

+13.9%

FCF margin

16.1%

FCF / Net income

2.63x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $183.6M · net income $11.2M · FCF $29.6M

2023-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

29.8%-0.3% pts

Operating margin

13.4%-1.3% pts

Net margin

6.1%-4.7% pts

FCF margin

16.1%+2.8% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$183.6M$183.6M$179.9M$170.7M
Net Income$11.2M$11.2M$21.3M$18.4M
EBITDA$22.8M$22.8M$34.2M$30.7M
EPS——4.594.23
Gross Margin29.8%29.8%30.0%30.1%
Operating Margin13.4%13.4%14.9%14.7%
Net Margin6.1%6.1%11.9%10.8%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.050.050.07—
Current Ratio4.214.21——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$29.6M$29.6M$22.8M$22.8M
Returns
ROE7.4%7.4%14.4%—
Valuation
P/E19.4319.439.988.75
EV/EBITDA961.88961.884.675.24
P/B144.91144.911.44—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth2.0%2.0%5.4%—
EPS Growth——8.5%—
Dividend Yield6.6%6.6%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +7765.7%

Total return

+7765.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

4.59 → n/d

Residual

+7759.1%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+6.6%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+7759.1%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.