StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
SYNX$1.16+0.87%
Fair $1.16+0.0%

SYNX

Silynxcom Ltd.

Technology / Communication EquipmentNYSE American

$1.16

+0.01 (+0.87%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.16Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 20/D
F-Score: 1/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-1.1M · quality 46.0/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 11/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

20/100

D

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -56.3%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · SYNXLocal privado en este navegador · Silynxcom Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$8M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-56.3%

↓

Gross Margin

36.3%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.21

↓
52-Week Range$1
$1$2

TradingView lightweight chart

SYNX price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.160Periodo -67.9%
Fair value: $1.160

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-7.2%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-46.4%

FCF / Net income

0.88x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $5.8M · net income $-3.1M · FCF $-2.7M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

36.3%+2.8% pts

Operating margin

-52.2%-58.8% pts

Net margin

-52.8%-77.5% pts

FCF margin

-46.4%-22.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$5.8M$5.8M$9.1M$7.6M$7.3M
Net Income$-3.1M$-3.1M$-2.3M$-2.8M$1.8M
EBITDA$-2.8M$-2.8M$-2.2M$-2.7M$1.9M
EPS——-0.45-0.890.34
Gross Margin36.3%36.3%41.8%41.5%33.4%
Operating Margin-52.2%-52.2%-16.2%-36.4%6.6%
Net Margin-52.8%-52.8%-25.8%-36.9%24.8%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.210.210.160.220.77
Current Ratio3.253.25———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-2.7M$-2.7M$-1.1M$727000.00$-1.7M
Returns
ROE-56.3%-56.3%-42.3%-126.9%225.3%
Valuation
P/B1.411.414.68——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-36.2%-36.2%19.1%5.1%—
EPS Growth——49.5%-360.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -31.8%

Total return

-31.8%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.45 → n/d

Residual

-31.8%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-31.8%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.