StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
SYSCHEM.BO$46.80-5.70%
Fair $46.80+0.0%

SYSCHEM.BO

Syschem (India) Limited

Healthcare / Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericBSE

$46.80

-2.84 (-5.70%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $46.80Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 48/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 21%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-318.1M · quality 60.7/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 22/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

48/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · SYSCHEM.BOLocal privado en este navegador · Syschem (India) Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2.3B

P/E

24.2x

↑

EV/EBITDA

10.5x

↓

ROE

8.9%

↑

Gross Margin

20.1%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.00

↓
52-Week Range$47
$41$62

TradingView lightweight chart

SYSCHEM.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $46.99Periodo -1.9%
Fair value: $46.80

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+71.3%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-1.6%

FCF / Net income

-0.98x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $6.55B · net income $109.3M · FCF $-106.7M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

20.1%-4.2% pts

Operating margin

2.6%-2.0% pts

Net margin

1.7%-1.8% pts

FCF margin

-1.6%+6.4% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$6.55B$6.55B$3.86B$2.33B$1.30B
Net Income$109.3M$109.3M$4.6M$27.6M$45.1M
EBITDA$211.1M$211.1M$40.2M$71.5M$88.7M
EPS——0.110.781.42
Gross Margin20.1%20.1%20.5%24.8%24.3%
Operating Margin2.6%2.6%0.3%1.8%4.6%
Net Margin1.7%1.7%0.1%1.2%3.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.000.00—0.010.07
Current Ratio1.341.34———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-106.7M$-106.7M$-318.1M$-323.3M$-104.5M
Returns
ROE8.9%8.9%0.5%4.8%20.2%
Valuation
P/E24.2524.25356.48——
EV/EBITDA10.5010.5040.22——
P/B1.871.871.80——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth69.5%69.5%65.5%79.1%—
EPS Growth——-86.2%-45.1%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +8.8%

Total return

+8.8%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.11 → n/d

Residual

+8.8%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+8.8%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.