StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
TAOX$4.21+0.24%
Fair $4.21+0.0%

TAOX

TAO Synergies Inc.

Technology / Software - InfrastructureNasdaqCM

$4.21

+0.01 (+0.24%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $4.21Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 16/F
F-Score: 2/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 24%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-5.2M · quality 51.7/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 32/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

16/100

F

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

20/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 7Warnings: 1unknown: 7
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -1.3%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · TAOXLocal privado en este navegador · TAO Synergies Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$31M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-131.2%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$4
$2$12

TradingView lightweight chart

TAOX price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $4.210Periodo -95.1%
Fair value: $4.210

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2019–2025 · 6 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-2138.4%

FCF / Net income

0.22x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $299061.0 · net income $-28.7M · FCF $-6.4M

2019-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

-3025.2%— pts

Net margin

-9609.2%— pts

FCF margin

-2138.4%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
Income Statement
Revenue$299061.00$299061.00——————
Net Income$-28.7M$-28.7M$-12.8M$-6.0M$-5.6M$-12.6M$-12.7M$-15.1M
EBITDA$-9.0M$-9.0M$-6.8M$-8.3M$-16.1M———
EPS-8.81-8.81-10.99-29.56-20.2562.75300.75—
Operating Margin-3025.2%-3025.2%——————
Net Margin-9609.2%-9609.2%——————
Balance Sheet
Current Ratio27.4027.40——————
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-6.4M$-6.4M$-4.9M$-5.2M$-11.2M$-8.7M$-8.1M$-11.9M
Returns
ROE-131.2%-131.2%-188.4%-23.6%-15.7%-37.6%-247.2%-86.9%
Valuation
P/B0.630.630.670.120.23———
Growth & Yield
EPS Growth19.8%19.8%62.8%-46.0%—-79.1%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +67.4%

Total return

+67.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-10.99 → -8.81

Residual

+67.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+67.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.