StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
TATT$42.39-2.12%
Fair $42.39+0.0%

TATT

TAT Technologies Ltd.

Industrials / Aerospace & DefenseNasdaqGM

$42.39

-0.92 (-2.12%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $42.39Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 55/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-3.3M · quality 43.7/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 11/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

55/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · TATTLocal privado en este navegador · TAT Technologies Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$550M

P/E

32.9x

↑

EV/EBITDA

21.9x

↑

ROE

9.5%

↑

Gross Margin

24.8%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.10

↓
52-Week Range$42
$26$65

TradingView lightweight chart

TATT price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $42.39Periodo +1079.5%
Fair value: $42.39

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+28.2%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

2.3%

FCF / Net income

0.24x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $178.0M · net income $16.8M · FCF $4.0M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

24.8%+5.9% pts

Operating margin

10.6%+10.6% pts

Net margin

9.4%+11.3% pts

FCF margin

2.3%+27.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$178.0M$178.0M$152.1M$113.8M$84.6M
Net Income$16.8M$16.8M$11.2M$4.7M$-1.6M
EBITDA$23.6M$23.6M$17.5M$11.1M$3.0M
EPS——1.000.51-0.17
Gross Margin24.8%24.8%21.7%19.7%18.8%
Operating Margin10.6%10.6%8.2%5.3%-0.1%
Net Margin9.4%9.4%7.3%4.1%-1.8%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.100.100.180.330.39
Current Ratio4.694.69———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$4.0M$4.0M$-10.9M$-3.3M$-21.1M
Returns
ROE9.5%9.5%10.0%5.2%-2.1%
Valuation
P/E32.8632.8627.1121.80—
EV/EBITDA21.9121.9118.1110.3223.48
P/B3.123.122.721.110.63
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth17.0%17.0%33.7%34.6%—
EPS Growth——96.1%391.4%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +62.9%

Total return

+62.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

1.00 → n/d

Residual

+62.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+62.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.