StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
TBH$4.69-6.39%
Fair $4.69+0.0%

TBH

Brag House Holdings, Inc.

Communication Services / Electronic Gaming & MultimediaNasdaqCM

$4.69

-0.32 (-6.39%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $4.69Fund rank 24/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 21/D
F-Score: 2/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 16%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-776996.00 · quality 37.7/100

Data gap 24/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 11/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

21/100

D

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists. ROE is -4.6%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · TBHLocal privado en este navegador · Brag House Holdings, Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$16M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-462.6%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

1.10

↑
52-Week Range$5
$2$19

TradingView lightweight chart

TBH price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $4.690Periodo -86.4%
Fair value: $4.690

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

—

FCF / Net income

0.42x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue — · net income $-15.9M · FCF $-6.6M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

—— pts

FCF margin

—— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue——$105.00$366438.00$250305.00
Net Income$-15.9M$-15.9M$-3.3M$-4.7M$-3.5M
EBITDA$-14.4M$-14.4M$-1.1M$-1.9M$-3.1M
EPS-1.31-1.31-0.31-0.44-0.34
Gross Margin——-341.9%90.5%58.3%
Operating Margin——-1420637.1%-541.0%-1252.4%
Net Margin——-3131922.9%-1275.1%-1409.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.101.10-0.71-0.74-0.92
Current Ratio1.561.56———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-6.6M$-6.6M$-570037.00$-776996.00$-2.1M
Returns
ROE-462.6%-462.6%38.9%76.9%179.9%
Valuation
P/B16.6216.62———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth——-100.0%46.4%—
EPS Growth-318.4%-318.4%29.6%-32.4%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +1.1%

Total return

+1.1%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.31 → -1.31

Residual

+1.1%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+1.1%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.