StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
TBTG.L$335.00+2.45%
Fair $335.00+0.0%

TBTG.L

The Beauty Tech Group plc

Consumer Defensive / Household & Personal ProductsLSE

$335.00

+8.00 (+2.45%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $335.00Fund rank 36/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 48/C
F-Score: 7/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 25% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $17.6M · quality 72.0/100

Data gap 36/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 63/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

48/100

C

Piotroski

7/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 0unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · TBTG.LLocal privado en este navegador · The Beauty Tech Group plc
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$356M

P/E

30.5x

↑

EV/EBITDA

1125.0x

↑

ROE

11.0%

↑

Gross Margin

62.7%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.04

↓
52-Week Range$335
$213$357

TradingView lightweight chart

TBTG.L price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $335.00Periodo +16.3%
Fair value: $335.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2025 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

17.5%

FCF / Net income

2.48x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $141.0M · net income $9.9M · FCF $24.7M

2023-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

62.7%— pts

Operating margin

21.5%— pts

Net margin

7.0%— pts

FCF margin

17.5%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$141.0M$141.0M$101.1M—
Net Income$9.9M$9.9M$1.7M—
EBITDA$27.8M$27.8M$18.1M—
EPS0.110.112.57—
Gross Margin62.7%62.7%56.8%—
Operating Margin21.5%21.5%13.9%—
Net Margin7.0%7.0%1.7%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.040.041.55-6.00
Current Ratio1.991.99——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$24.7M$24.7M$10.6M—
Returns
ROE11.0%11.0%6.0%—
Valuation
P/E30.4530.45——
EV/EBITDA1124.981124.98——
P/B348.17348.17——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth39.4%39.4%——
EPS Growth-95.7%-95.7%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

546.5%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$29.73

Spread vs growth

-642.2%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

218.4%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$35.97

Spread vs growth

-314.1%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

87.1%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$57.93

Spread vs growth

-182.9%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total +16.3%

Total return

+16.3%

Start / end P/E

112.1x → 3045.5x

EPS bridge

2.57 → 0.11

Residual

-2505.1%

EPS growth-95.7%
Multiple rerating+2617.1%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-2505.1%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.