StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
TCG.MI$3.24+1.25%
Fair $3.24+0.0%

TCG.MI

Tecno S.p.a.

Industrials / Consulting ServicesMilan

$3.24

+0.04 (+1.25%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $3.24Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 43/C
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 26% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-589500.00 · quality 56.3/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 40/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

43/100

C

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

8/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 2Warnings: 0unknown: 2
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Limited financial history; valuation confidence should be treated as provisional. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · TCG.MILocal privado en este navegador · Tecno S.p.a.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$47M

P/E

54.0x

↑

EV/EBITDA

9.0x

↓

ROE

6.5%

↑

Gross Margin

100.7%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.61

↑
52-Week Range$3
$3$4

TradingView lightweight chart

TCG.MI price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $3.240Periodo +8.7%
Fair value: $3.240

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2024 · 1 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+50.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-4.7%

FCF / Net income

-1.40x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $24.8M · net income $823600.0 · FCF $-1.2M

2023-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

100.7%+3.5% pts

Operating margin

3.6%+2.3% pts

Net margin

3.3%+2.1% pts

FCF margin

-4.7%-4.5% pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$24.8M$24.8M$16.4M
Net Income$823600.00$823600.00$196000.00
EBITDA$5.2M$5.2M$2.0M
EPS0.060.060.01
Gross Margin100.7%100.7%97.1%
Operating Margin3.6%3.6%1.3%
Net Margin3.3%3.3%1.2%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.610.610.44
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-1.2M$-1.2M$-27000.00
Returns
ROE6.5%6.5%1.5%
Valuation
P/E54.0054.00—
EV/EBITDA9.059.05—
P/B3.523.52—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth50.8%50.8%—
EPS Growth320.2%320.2%—
Dividend Yield0.5%0.5%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

69.1%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$0.29

Spread vs growth

251.1%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

42.4%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$0.35

Spread vs growth

277.8%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

25.1%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$0.56

Spread vs growth

295.1%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total +9.3%

Total return

+9.3%

Start / end P/E

210.5x → 54.5x

EPS bridge

0.01 → 0.06

Residual

-237.3%

EPS growth+320.2%
Multiple rerating-74.1%
Dividend+0.5%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-237.3%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.