StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
TIRUPATIIN.BO$8.37-4.96%
Fair $8.37+0.0%

TIRUPATIIN.BO

Tirupati Innovar Limited

Consumer Cyclical / Auto PartsBSE

$8.37

-0.46 (-4.96%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $8.37Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 43/C
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 21%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-2.9M · quality 60.3/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 21/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

43/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 1.8%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · TIRUPATIIN.BOLocal privado en este navegador · Tirupati Innovar Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$221M

P/E

7.0x

↓

EV/EBITDA

19.9x

↑

ROE

1.8%

↓

Gross Margin

9.1%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.08

↓
52-Week Range$8
$6$14

TradingView lightweight chart

TIRUPATIIN.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $8.810Periodo -28.8%
Fair value: $8.370

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-40.6%

FCF / Net income

-4.48x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $109.9M · net income $10.0M · FCF $-44.6M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

9.1%— pts

Operating margin

4.7%— pts

Net margin

9.1%— pts

FCF margin

-40.6%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$109.9M$109.9M———
Net Income$10.0M$10.0M$884000.00$2.2M$1.6M
EBITDA$13.3M$13.3M$1.2M$-744000.00$-1.1M
EPS0.380.380.040.080.43
Gross Margin9.1%9.1%———
Operating Margin4.7%4.7%———
Net Margin9.1%9.1%———
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.080.08———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-44.6M$-44.6M$179000.00$-2.9M$756000.00
Returns
ROE1.8%1.8%0.2%0.4%13.1%
Valuation
P/E6.976.97———
EV/EBITDA19.9319.93———
P/B0.400.40———
Growth & Yield
EPS Growth925.0%925.0%-55.6%-80.4%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

25.1%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$0.74

Spread vs growth

899.9%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

18.8%

exigente

EPS terminal req.

$0.90

Spread vs growth

906.2%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

14.3%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$1.45

Spread vs growth

910.7%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -14.1%

Total return

-14.1%

Start / end P/E

277.4x → 23.2x

EPS bridge

0.04 → 0.38

Residual

-847.5%

EPS growth+925.0%
Multiple rerating-91.6%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-847.5%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.