StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
TLSI$3.67+7.62%
Fair $3.67+0.0%

TLSI

TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc.

Healthcare / Medical DevicesNasdaqGM

$3.67

+0.26 (+7.62%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $3.67Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 29/D
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-41.2M · quality 69.0/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 33/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

29/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

20/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 6Warnings: 1unknown: 6
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 1.2%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · TLSILocal privado en este navegador · TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$225M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

115.8%

↑

Gross Margin

84.6%

↑

Debt/Equity

-1.02

↓
52-Week Range$4
$2$8

TradingView lightweight chart

TLSI price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $3.670Periodo -65.1%
Fair value: $3.670

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2020–2025 · 5 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-41.9%

FCF / Net income

0.48x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $45.2M · net income $-39.2M · FCF $-18.9M

2020-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

84.6%— pts

Operating margin

-59.7%— pts

Net margin

-86.9%— pts

FCF margin

-41.9%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
Income Statement
Revenue$45.2M$45.2M$29.4M$18.5M$12.4M——
Net Income$-39.2M$-39.2M$-30.0M$-59.4M$-47.2M$4.8M—
EBITDA$-33.0M$-33.0M$-26.2M$-58.7M$-46.8M——
EPS——-1.31-6.73-161.55——
Gross Margin84.6%84.6%86.1%85.9%81.8%——
Operating Margin-59.7%-59.7%-122.9%-294.3%-293.9%——
Net Margin-86.9%-86.9%-102.1%-320.7%-380.6%——
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-1.02-1.02-0.91-0.06-0.01——
Current Ratio5.785.78—————
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-18.9M$-18.9M$-41.2M$-51.2M$-33.1M——
Returns
ROE115.8%115.8%116.0%219.3%26.8%-3.7%—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth53.4%53.4%59.0%49.3%———
EPS Growth——80.5%95.8%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -26.6%

Total return

-26.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-1.31 → n/d

Residual

-26.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-26.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.