StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
TOYO$14.47-0.28%
Fair $14.47+0.0%

TOYO

TOYO Co., Ltd.

Technology / SolarNasdaqCM

$14.47

-0.04 (-0.28%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $14.47Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 62/B
F-Score: 7/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $2.5M · quality 45.7/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 20/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

62/100

B

Piotroski

7/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · TOYOLocal privado en este navegador · TOYO Co., Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$546M

P/E

7.4x

↓

EV/EBITDA

4.7x

↓

ROE

35.6%

↑

Gross Margin

22.5%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.66

↑
52-Week Range$14
$3$17

TradingView lightweight chart

TOYO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $14.47Periodo +46.8%
Fair value: $14.47

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

9.6%

FCF / Net income

1.04x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $427.4M · net income $39.7M · FCF $41.2M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

22.5%— pts

Operating margin

13.8%— pts

Net margin

9.3%— pts

FCF margin

9.6%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$427.4M$427.4M$177.0M$62.4M—
Net Income$39.7M$39.7M$40.6M$9.9M$-186839.00
EBITDA$98.6M$98.6M$32.4M$14.7M$-186346.00
EPS1.131.131.090.22-0.00
Gross Margin22.5%22.5%12.4%26.7%—
Operating Margin13.8%13.8%5.0%19.2%—
Net Margin9.3%9.3%23.0%15.9%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.660.661.240.220.03
Current Ratio0.680.68———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$41.2M$41.2M$2.5M$-126.8M$-5.8M
Returns
ROE35.6%35.6%68.6%17.4%-2.4%
Valuation
P/E7.427.423.3949.41—
EV/EBITDA4.674.675.3632.85—
P/B3.953.951.928.5957.63
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth141.5%141.5%183.7%——
EPS Growth3.7%3.7%388.7%5392.7%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

4.3%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$1.28

Spread vs growth

-0.7%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

6.6%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$1.55

Spread vs growth

-2.9%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

8.3%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$2.50

Spread vs growth

-4.6%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +309.9%

Total return

+309.9%

Start / end P/E

3.2x → 12.8x

EPS bridge

1.09 → 1.13

Residual

+10.8%

EPS growth+3.7%
Multiple rerating+295.4%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+10.8%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.