StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
TRUEGREEN.BO$162.15+1.98%
Fair $162.15+0.0%

TRUEGREEN.BO

True Green Bio Energy Limited

Consumer Cyclical / Textile ManufacturingBSE

$162.15

+3.15 (+1.98%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $162.15Fund rank 21/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 29/D
F-Score: 0/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 17%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-381.1M · quality 42.3/100

Data gap 21/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 18/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

29/100

D

Piotroski

0/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -1.9%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · TRUEGREEN.BOLocal privado en este navegador · True Green Bio Energy Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$5.3B

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

1885.7x

↑

ROE

-1.9%

↓

Gross Margin

16.7%

↓

Debt/Equity

1.50

↑
52-Week Range$162
$53$179

TradingView lightweight chart

TRUEGREEN.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $162.15Periodo +46.1%
Fair value: $162.15

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-808.7%

FCF / Net income

85.92x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $232.9M · net income $-21.9M · FCF $-1.88B

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

16.7%— pts

Operating margin

-5.4%— pts

Net margin

-9.4%— pts

FCF margin

-808.7%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$232.9M$232.9M———
Net Income$-21.9M$-21.9M$8.1M$-59.3M$78.4M
EBITDA$3.3M$3.3M$-14.7M$28.4M$26.3M
EPS-0.78-0.780.30-2.192.89
Gross Margin16.7%16.7%———
Operating Margin-5.4%-5.4%———
Net Margin-9.4%-9.4%———
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.501.500.200.000.29
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-1.88B$-1.88B$-381.1M$199.0M$-61.8M
Returns
ROE-1.9%-1.9%0.9%-6.7%8.4%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA1885.751885.75———
P/B3.923.92———
Growth & Yield
EPS Growth-360.0%-360.0%113.7%-175.8%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +138.4%

Total return

+138.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.30 → -0.78

Residual

+138.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+138.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.