Communication Services / Advertising AgenciesNYSE
$6.72
+0.12 (+1.82%)
FCF base 3Y
n/d
n/d CAGR · yield n/d
FCF base 5Y
n/d
n/d base · n/d expected
Precio de entrada
n/d
MOS 24% · confianza 25%
FCF escenarios
weak_data · normalized FCF $31.3M · quality 65.3/100
Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.
SA Score
20/100
D
Piotroski
4/9
balance/quality
Valuation
50/100
+0.0% upside
5Y CAGR
+0.0%
50/100
Data QA
20/100
SEC 0%
Sin guardar todavía.
Market Cap
$121M
P/E
N/A
•EV/EBITDA
10.1x
↑ROE
25.9%
↑Gross Margin
25.5%
↓Debt/Equity
-10.87
↓TradingView lightweight chart
Absolute Values (Left Axis)
Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)
Financial statement dashboard
2012–2025 · 13 años de histórico normalizado
Revenue CAGR
+5.1%
FCF CAGR
+3.4%
FCF margin
3.6%
FCF / Net income
-1.34x
Latest source
Provider fallback
Margin decomposition
Último año: revenue $427.4M · net income $-11.5M · FCF $15.4M
Gross margin
Operating margin
Net margin
FCF margin
| Metric | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income Statement | |||||||||||||||
| Revenue | $427.4M | $427.4M | $451.0M | $454.2M | $463.1M | $418.0M | $371.3M | $431.4M | $407.9M | $389.6M | $421.6M | $441.2M | $373.9M | $268.6M | $222.7M |
| Net Income | $-11.5M | $-11.5M | $-12.7M | $-45.0M | $12.3M | $16.7M | $-82.5M | $-67.8M | $-98.7M | $-13.7M | $23.0M | $9.8M | $-17.4M | $10.1M | $6.4M |
| EBITDA | $58.2M | $58.2M | $49.7M | $11.8M | $75.3M | $93.6M | $-54.9M | $-11.3M | $37.4M | $65.8M | $91.5M | — | — | — | — |
| EPS | — | — | -0.81 | -2.68 | 0.68 | — | — | — | — | -0.56 | 0.85 | 0.37 | -1.41 | — | — |
| Gross Margin | 25.5% | 25.5% | 27.5% | 27.5% | 29.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 13.1% | 13.1% | 14.1% | 16.0% | 19.6% | 17.8% | -20.2% | -8.6% | 4.4% | 12.2% | 17.7% | 19.2% | 10.8% | 17.2% | 15.8% |
| Net Margin | -2.7% | -2.7% | -2.8% | -9.9% | 2.7% | 4.0% | -22.2% | -15.7% | -24.2% | -3.5% | 5.5% | 2.2% | -4.6% | 3.7% | 2.9% |
| Balance Sheet | |||||||||||||||
| Debt/Equity | -10.87 | -10.87 | -16.29 | 85.88 | 8.83 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Current Ratio | 0.82 | 0.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Cash Flow | |||||||||||||||
| Free Cash Flow | $15.4M | $15.4M | $31.3M | $52.8M | $29.4M | $48.7M | $16.5M | $20.3M | $16.7M | $35.6M | $43.3M | $11.2M | $31.7M | $16.7M | $10.0M |
| Returns | |||||||||||||||
| ROE | 25.9% | 25.9% | 39.9% | -701.4% | 18.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4.3% | — |
| Valuation | |||||||||||||||
| P/E | — | — | — | — | 10.65 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.12 | 10.12 | 12.91 | 56.08 | 8.85 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B | — | — | — | 26.78 | 2.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Growth & Yield | |||||||||||||||
| Revenue Growth | -5.2% | -5.2% | -0.7% | -1.9% | — | 12.6% | -13.9% | 5.8% | 4.7% | -7.6% | -4.5% | 18.0% | 39.2% | 20.6% | — |
| EPS Growth | — | — | 69.8% | -494.1% | — | — | — | — | — | -165.9% | 129.7% | 126.2% | — | — | — |
| Dividend Yield | 12.1% | 12.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)
Margins (%)
Returns (%)
Leverage & Liquidity
Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.
Total return
+9.5%
Start / end P/E
n/dx → n/dx
EPS bridge
-0.81 → n/d
Residual
-2.6%
EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.
Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.