StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
TXP.TO$0.13-5.36%
Fair $0.13+0.0%

TXP.TO

Touchstone Exploration Inc.

Energy / Oil & Gas E&PToronto

$0.13

-0.01 (-5.36%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.13Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 28/D
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 22%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-8.2M · quality 62.0/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 38/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

28/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists.
Thesis & Journal · TXP.TOLocal privado en este navegador · Touchstone Exploration Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$43M

P/E

3.3x

↓

EV/EBITDA

5.9x

↓

ROE

11.6%

↑

Gross Margin

48.1%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.75

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

TXP.TO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.132Periodo -53.6%
Fair value: $0.133

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+2.5%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-17.8%

FCF / Net income

-0.76x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $46.3M · net income $10.9M · FCF $-8.2M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

48.1%-7.7% pts

Operating margin

-2.6%-15.7% pts

Net margin

23.5%+31.0% pts

FCF margin

-17.8%-4.8% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$46.3M$46.3M$57.5M$48.2M$43.0M
Net Income$10.9M$10.9M$8.3M$-20.6M$-3.2M
EBITDA$17.4M$17.4M$18.4M$-4.2M$8.3M
EPS——0.03-0.09-0.01
Gross Margin48.1%48.1%59.4%62.2%55.9%
Operating Margin-2.6%-2.6%19.5%19.4%13.1%
Net Margin23.5%23.5%14.4%-42.8%-7.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.750.750.570.520.36
Current Ratio0.520.52———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-8.2M$-8.2M$-10.5M$-6.2M$-5.6M
Returns
ROE11.6%11.6%12.0%-34.5%-4.1%
Valuation
P/E3.313.3115.33——
EV/EBITDA5.945.947.67—29.30
P/B0.460.461.582.852.97
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-19.6%-19.6%19.5%12.0%—
EPS Growth——133.3%-800.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -63.2%

Total return

-63.2%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.03 → n/d

Residual

-63.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-63.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.