StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
UD.MI$2.87+0.53%
Fair $2.87+0.0%

UD.MI

Unidata S.p.A.

Communication Services / Telecom ServicesMilan

$2.87

+0.02 (+0.53%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $2.87Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 43/C
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-4.4M · quality 49.3/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 17/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

43/100

C

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 0unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · UD.MILocal privado en este navegador · Unidata S.p.A.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$87M

P/E

12.5x

↓

EV/EBITDA

3.6x

↓

ROE

10.4%

↑

Gross Margin

90.5%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.09

↓
52-Week Range$3
$3$4

TradingView lightweight chart

UD.MI price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $2.845Periodo +89.7%
Fair value: $2.870

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2023 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+59.9%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

1.5%

FCF / Net income

0.21x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $93.3M · net income $6.7M · FCF $1.4M

2021-FY → 2023-FY

Gross margin

90.5%+11.4% pts

Operating margin

13.9%-11.9% pts

Net margin

7.2%-14.3% pts

FCF margin

1.5%+16.0% pts
MetricTTM
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$93.3M$93.3M$51.3M$36.5M
Net Income$6.7M$6.7M$7.5M$7.8M
EBITDA$22.4M$22.4M$16.5M$14.0M
EPS0.670.672.960.32
Gross Margin90.5%90.5%84.6%79.1%
Operating Margin13.9%13.9%22.0%25.8%
Net Margin7.2%7.2%14.6%21.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.090.090.600.41
Current Ratio1.251.25——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$1.4M$1.4M$-4.4M$-5.3M
Returns
ROE10.4%10.4%20.3%27.0%
Valuation
P/E12.4812.481.7016.67
EV/EBITDA3.583.588.239.61
P/B1.351.353.414.50
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth81.6%81.6%40.8%—
EPS Growth-77.4%-77.4%830.8%—
Dividend Yield0.3%0.3%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-27.6%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.25

Spread vs growth

-49.8%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

-14.4%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.31

Spread vs growth

-63.0%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

-3.0%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.50

Spread vs growth

-74.4%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -1.5%

Total return

-1.5%

Start / end P/E

1.0x → 4.2x

EPS bridge

2.96 → 0.67

Residual

-257.9%

EPS growth-77.4%
Multiple rerating+333.4%
Dividend+0.3%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-257.9%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.