StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
UML.BO$52.01-1.31%
Fair $52.01+0.0%

UML.BO

Umiya Mobile Limited

Consumer Cyclical / Specialty RetailBSE

$52.01

-0.69 (-1.31%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $52.01Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 50/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 21%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-77.6M · quality 57.3/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 21/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

50/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · UML.BOLocal privado en este navegador · Umiya Mobile Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$740M

P/E

12.4x

↓

EV/EBITDA

5.1x

↓

ROE

19.0%

↑

Gross Margin

1.4%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.13

↓
52-Week Range$52
$42$121

TradingView lightweight chart

UML.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $52.01Periodo -24.4%
Fair value: $52.01

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+39.2%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

0.0%

FCF / Net income

0.04x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $8.36B · net income $91.9M · FCF $3.6M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

1.4%+3.7% pts

Operating margin

-4.1%-4.5% pts

Net margin

1.1%+1.0% pts

FCF margin

0.0%+1.9% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$8.36B$8.36B$5.60B$4.20B$3.10B
Net Income$91.9M$91.9M$55.1M$23.5M$1.8M
EBITDA$151.4M$151.4M$105.1M$56.5M$18.0M
EPS——3.871.650.13
Gross Margin1.4%1.4%-0.7%-1.5%-2.3%
Operating Margin-4.1%-4.1%-5.6%1.2%0.5%
Net Margin1.1%1.1%1.0%0.6%0.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.130.131.692.102.39
Current Ratio2.392.39———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$3.6M$3.6M$-166.0M$-77.6M$-57.8M
Returns
ROE19.0%19.0%39.4%28.2%3.1%
Valuation
P/E12.4112.41———
EV/EBITDA5.075.07———
P/B1.531.53———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth49.3%49.3%33.3%35.6%—
EPS Growth——134.4%1188.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -24.4%

Total return

-24.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

3.87 → n/d

Residual

-24.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-24.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.