StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
UNCY$7.35-3.29%
Fair $7.35+0.0%

UNCY

Unicycive Therapeutics, Inc.

Healthcare / BiotechnologyNasdaqCM

$7.35

-0.25 (-3.29%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $7.35Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 29/D
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-28.6M · quality 68.3/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 33/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

29/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

20/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 6Warnings: 1unknown: 6
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific biotech pipeline model required: targets are disabled until product, probability, peak-sales and cash-runway data exists. ROE is -87.9%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · UNCYLocal privado en este navegador · Unicycive Therapeutics, Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$196M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-87.9%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.01

↓
52-Week Range$7
$4$11

TradingView lightweight chart

UNCY price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $7.350Periodo -85.3%
Fair value: $7.350

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2020–2025 · 5 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

—

FCF / Net income

1.18x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue — · net income $-26.6M · FCF $-31.3M

2020-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

—— pts

FCF margin

—— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
Income Statement
Revenue———$675000.00$951000.00——
Net Income$-26.6M$-26.6M$-36.7M$-30.5M$-18.1M$-10.0M$-2.3M
EBITDA$-25.9M$-25.9M$-36.2M$-30.2M$-17.9M$-8.5M—
EPS-1.67-1.67-5.65-12.80-12.00-8.60-2.70
Operating Margin———-3077.6%-1898.2%——
Net Margin———-4525.0%-1898.8%——
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.010.010.10-0.21-0.43——
Current Ratio2.402.40—————
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-31.3M$-31.3M$-28.6M$-18.3M$-15.7M$-5.8M—
Returns
ROE-87.9%-87.9%-494.3%801.9%3875.1%-60.8%84.8%
Valuation
P/B3.873.877.02————
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth———-29.0%———
EPS Growth70.4%70.4%55.9%-6.7%—-218.5%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +11.0%

Total return

+11.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-5.65 → -1.67

Residual

+11.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+11.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.