StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
UNIQ.JK$106.00+0.00%
Fair $106.00+0.0%

UNIQ.JK

PT Ulima Nitra Tbk

Energy / Thermal CoalJakarta

$106.00

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $106.00Fund rank 36/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 37/D
F-Score: 2/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $94.5B · quality 74.7/100

Data gap 36/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 75/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

37/100

D

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists.
Thesis & Journal · UNIQ.JKLocal privado en este navegador · PT Ulima Nitra Tbk
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$332.7B

P/E

45.7x

↑

EV/EBITDA

6.6x

↓

ROE

7.8%

↑

Gross Margin

17.7%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.35

↑
52-Week Range$106
$95$520

TradingView lightweight chart

UNIQ.JK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $106.00Periodo -33.3%
Fair value: $106.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+10.5%

FCF CAGR

+12.7%

FCF margin

16.5%

FCF / Net income

2.51x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $572.68B · net income $37.68B · FCF $94.50B

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

17.7%+5.8% pts

Operating margin

11.4%+5.5% pts

Net margin

6.6%+1.2% pts

FCF margin

16.5%+1.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$572.68B$572.68B$670.15B$571.54B$424.78B
Net Income$37.68B$37.68B$67.60B$42.48B$22.94B
EBITDA$74.16B$74.16B$106.57B$76.18B$52.63B
EPS——21.5313.537.31
Gross Margin17.7%17.7%19.6%15.5%11.9%
Operating Margin11.4%11.4%15.1%10.3%5.9%
Net Margin6.6%6.6%10.1%7.4%5.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.350.350.470.680.42
Current Ratio1.701.70———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$94.50B$94.50B$187.70B$66.96B$66.05B
Returns
ROE7.8%7.8%15.2%10.9%6.4%
Valuation
P/E45.6945.6922.0214.938.62
EV/EBITDA6.596.5915.6911.655.85
P/B0.690.693.351.630.55
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-14.5%-14.5%17.3%34.5%—
EPS Growth——59.1%85.1%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -76.5%

Total return

-76.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

21.53 → n/d

Residual

-76.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-76.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.