StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
URR.SI$0.42+0.00%
Fair $0.42+0.0%

URR.SI

Sim Leisure Group Ltd.

Consumer Cyclical / LeisureSES

$0.42

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.42Fund rank 34/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 54/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 25% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $18.2M · quality 66.0/100

Data gap 34/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 65/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

54/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · URR.SILocal privado en este navegador · Sim Leisure Group Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$69M

P/E

5.3x

↓

EV/EBITDA

1.1x

↓

ROE

27.1%

↑

Gross Margin

34.6%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.70

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

URR.SI price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.420Periodo +148.5%
Fair value: $0.420

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+26.9%

FCF CAGR

+32.8%

FCF margin

45.9%

FCF / Net income

1.55x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $138.1M · net income $40.8M · FCF $63.3M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

34.6%-30.8% pts

Operating margin

14.6%-34.1% pts

Net margin

29.6%-3.2% pts

FCF margin

45.9%+5.9% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$138.1M$138.1M$167.8M$135.5M$67.6M
Net Income$40.8M$40.8M$22.9M$21.9M$22.2M
EBITDA$78.4M$78.4M$63.9M$45.8M$43.4M
EPS——0.140.130.13
Gross Margin34.6%34.6%49.5%42.9%65.4%
Operating Margin14.6%14.6%31.9%23.1%48.7%
Net Margin29.6%29.6%13.6%16.2%32.8%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.700.700.880.640.38
Current Ratio2.652.65———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$63.3M$63.3M$17.5M$18.2M$27.0M
Returns
ROE27.1%27.1%19.7%22.1%26.0%
Valuation
P/E5.255.255.453.891.94
EV/EBITDA1.091.092.812.300.89
P/B0.460.461.070.860.50
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-17.7%-17.7%23.9%100.4%—
EPS Growth——4.7%-1.3%—
Dividend Yield3.1%3.1%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -29.2%

Total return

-29.2%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.14 → n/d

Residual

-32.3%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+3.1%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-32.3%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.