StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
UXIN$2.30+2.22%
Fair $2.30+0.0%

UXIN

Uxin Limited

Consumer Cyclical / Auto & Truck DealershipsNasdaqGS

$2.30

+0.05 (+2.22%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $2.30Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 26/D
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 24%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-284.3M · quality 70.3/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 38/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

26/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 1.2%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · UXINLocal privado en este navegador · Uxin Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$506M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

120.2%

↑

Gross Margin

6.7%

↓

Debt/Equity

-8.48

↓
52-Week Range$2
$2$5

TradingView lightweight chart

UXIN price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $2.300Periodo -99.8%
Fair value: $2.300

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+25.6%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-16.2%

FCF / Net income

1.89x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $3.24B · net income $-277.5M · FCF $-525.8M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

6.7%+3.8% pts

Operating margin

-5.4%+11.7% pts

Net margin

-8.6%+0.2% pts

FCF margin

-16.2%+36.6% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$3.24B$3.24B$1.37B$2.06B$1.64B
Net Income$-277.5M$-277.5M$-372.4M$-137.2M$-143.2M
EBITDA$-105.7M$-105.7M$-271.8M$-95.0M$-72.4M
EPS——-333.00-198.00-36.00
Gross Margin6.7%6.7%5.9%1.2%2.9%
Operating Margin-5.4%-5.4%-22.7%-17.3%-17.0%
Net Margin-8.6%-8.6%-27.1%-6.7%-8.8%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-8.48-8.48-6.08-0.45-0.78
Current Ratio0.790.79———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-525.8M$-525.8M$-275.1M$-284.3M$-863.6M
Returns
ROE120.2%120.2%127.2%7.5%9.5%
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth135.7%135.7%-33.2%25.9%—
EPS Growth——-68.2%-450.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -43.9%

Total return

-43.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-333.00 → n/d

Residual

-43.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-43.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.