StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
VDI.OL$167.00+0.60%
Fair $167.00+0.0%

VDI.OL

VDI.OL

Energy / Oil & Gas DrillingOslo

$167.00

+1.00 (+0.60%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $167.00Fund rank 33/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 22/D
F-Score: 5/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 26% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-53.3M · quality 68.0/100

Data gap 33/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 53/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

22/100

D

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

8/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 2Warnings: 1unknown: 2
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Limited financial history; valuation confidence should be treated as provisional. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. ROE is -1.3%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · VDI.OLLocal privado en este navegador · VDI.OL
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2.3B

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

28.8x

↑

ROE

-1.3%

↓

Gross Margin

-0.2%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.69

↑
52-Week Range$167
$150$252

TradingView lightweight chart

VDI.OL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $167.00Periodo -44.3%
Fair value: $167.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2022 · 1 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+75.9%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-10.5%

FCF / Net income

8.69x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $278.7M · net income $-3.4M · FCF $-29.2M

2021-FY → 2022-FY

Gross margin

-0.2%+30.4% pts

Operating margin

-8.5%+35.1% pts

Net margin

-1.2%+68.3% pts

FCF margin

-10.5%+38.4% pts
MetricTTM
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$278.7M$278.7M$158.4M
Net Income$-3.4M$-3.4M$-110.1M
EBITDA$79.7M$79.7M$-14.8M
EPS-0.26-0.26-8.40
Gross Margin-0.2%-0.2%-30.6%
Operating Margin-8.5%-8.5%-43.6%
Net Margin-1.2%-1.2%-69.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.690.691.32
Current Ratio1.751.75—
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-29.2M$-29.2M$-77.4M
Returns
ROE-1.3%-1.3%-41.7%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA28.8128.81—
P/B8.408.40—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth75.9%75.9%—
EPS Growth96.9%96.9%—
Dividend Yield30.2%30.2%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -3.6%

Total return

-3.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-8.40 → -0.26

Residual

-33.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+30.2%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-33.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.