StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
VEN.AX$0.00+20.00%
Fair $0.00+0.0%

VEN.AX

Vintage Energy Limited

Energy / Oil & Gas E&PASX

$0.00

+0.00 (+20.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.00Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 8/F
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-6.6M · quality 51.3/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 20/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

8/100

F

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. ROE is -16.2%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · VEN.AXLocal privado en este navegador · Vintage Energy Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$7M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-16.2%

↓

Gross Margin

49.6%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.35

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

VEN.AX price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.003Periodo -98.5%
Fair value: $0.003

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-141.1%

FCF / Net income

1.50x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $4.7M · net income $-4.4M · FCF $-6.6M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

49.6%— pts

Operating margin

-78.2%— pts

Net margin

-94.2%— pts

FCF margin

-141.1%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$4.7M$4.7M$5.2M$949333.00—
Net Income$-4.4M$-4.4M$-23.2M$-11.3M$-8.0M
EBITDA$-1.5M$-1.5M$-20.3M$-8.8M$-7.6M
EPS-0.00-0.00-0.02-0.01-0.01
Gross Margin49.6%49.6%43.5%-57.2%—
Operating Margin-78.2%-78.2%-452.6%-1300.1%—
Net Margin-94.2%-94.2%-450.9%-1186.3%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.350.350.300.170.14
Current Ratio0.180.18———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-6.6M$-6.6M$-6.6M$-16.2M$-9.3M
Returns
ROE-16.2%-16.2%-78.3%-24.7%-15.8%
Valuation
P/B0.190.190.341.211.31
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-9.6%-9.6%442.7%——
EPS Growth89.0%89.0%-82.8%-29.7%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -40.0%

Total return

-40.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.02 → -0.00

Residual

-40.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-40.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.