StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
VIKRAN.NS$70.87-5.39%
Fair $70.87+0.0%

VIKRAN.NS

VIKRAN.NS

Industrials / Engineering & ConstructionNSE

$70.87

-4.04 (-5.39%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $70.87Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 43/C
F-Score: 2/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-1.3B · quality 49.3/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 10/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

43/100

C

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · VIKRAN.NSLocal privado en este navegador · VIKRAN.NS
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$18.3B

P/E

17.5x

↑

EV/EBITDA

11.0x

↑

ROE

7.4%

↑

Gross Margin

26.5%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.24

↓
52-Week Range$71
$51$118

TradingView lightweight chart

VIKRAN.NS price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $70.96Periodo -25.9%
Fair value: $70.87

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+33.6%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-35.2%

FCF / Net income

-4.80x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $12.49B · net income $917.0M · FCF $-4.40B

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

26.5%-4.3% pts

Operating margin

13.7%-1.3% pts

Net margin

7.3%-0.8% pts

FCF margin

-35.2%-36.1% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$12.49B$12.49B$9.16B$7.77B$5.24B
Net Income$917.0M$917.0M$778.1M$748.3M$428.4M
EBITDA$1.91B$1.91B$1.67B$1.32B$794.4M
EPS——3.022.901.66
Gross Margin26.5%26.5%29.7%28.8%30.8%
Operating Margin13.7%13.7%17.2%17.0%15.1%
Net Margin7.3%7.3%8.5%9.6%8.2%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.240.240.590.631.19
Current Ratio1.981.98———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-4.40B$-4.40B$-1.32B$-685.3M$46.2M
Returns
ROE7.4%7.4%16.6%25.7%32.7%
Valuation
P/E17.5017.50———
EV/EBITDA10.9810.98———
P/B1.481.48———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth36.4%36.4%17.9%48.1%—
EPS Growth——4.0%74.7%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -25.9%

Total return

-25.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

3.02 → n/d

Residual

-25.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-25.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.