StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
VITA.V$0.65+0.00%
Fair $0.65+0.0%

VITA.V

Vitalist Inc.

Technology / Information Technology ServicesTSXV

$0.65

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.65Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 23/D
F-Score: 2/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 23%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-3.7M · quality 65.7/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 30/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

23/100

D

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · VITA.VLocal privado en este navegador · Vitalist Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$43M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

26.7%

↑

Gross Margin

33.0%

↑

Debt/Equity

-0.80

↓
52-Week Range$1
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

VITA.V price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.650Periodo -98.9%
Fair value: $0.650

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-13.3%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-31.7%

FCF / Net income

0.42x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $4.8M · net income $-3.6M · FCF $-1.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

33.0%+12.6% pts

Operating margin

-42.3%+80.5% pts

Net margin

-75.4%+64.6% pts

FCF margin

-31.7%+146.9% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$4.8M$4.8M$1.9M$7.6M$7.3M
Net Income$-3.6M$-3.6M$4.2M$-28.1M$-10.2M
EBITDA$-2.2M$-2.2M$6.0M$-25.7M$-8.1M
EPS-0.08-0.080.20-11.10-4.50
Gross Margin33.0%33.0%36.3%-55.2%20.4%
Operating Margin-42.3%-42.3%-226.0%-216.1%-122.8%
Net Margin-75.4%-75.4%215.9%-371.1%-140.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-0.80-0.80-0.92-0.571.16
Current Ratio0.170.17———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-1.5M$-1.5M$-3.7M$-7.3M$-13.0M
Returns
ROE26.7%26.7%-41.7%124.4%-210.6%
Valuation
P/E——1.05——
EV/EBITDA——2.17——
P/B————2.85
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth145.9%145.9%-74.5%3.7%—
EPS Growth-140.0%-140.0%101.8%-146.7%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +4.8%

Total return

+4.8%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.20 → -0.08

Residual

+4.8%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+4.8%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.