StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
VS$1.64+10.81%
Fair $1.64+0.0%

VS

Versus Systems Inc.

Technology / Software - ApplicationNasdaqCM

$1.64

+0.16 (+10.81%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.64Fund rank 24/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 23/D
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 16%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-5.0M · quality 36.7/100

Data gap 24/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 16/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

23/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -17.6%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · VSLocal privado en este navegador · Versus Systems Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$8M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-17.6%

↓

Gross Margin

99.2%

↑

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$2
$1$3

TradingView lightweight chart

VS price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.640Periodo -99.6%
Fair value: $1.640

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+25.3%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-121.9%

FCF / Net income

1.49x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $2.2M · net income $-1.8M · FCF $-2.7M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

99.2%+54.9% pts

Operating margin

-99.0%+1141.3% pts

Net margin

-82.1%+1944.6% pts

FCF margin

-121.9%+932.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$2.2M$2.2M$57288.00$271169.00$1.1M
Net Income$-1.8M$-1.8M$-4.0M$-9.5M$-22.5M
EBITDA$-2.2M$-2.2M$-4.5M$-4.1M$-10.7M
EPS——-1.54-10.44-192.89
Gross Margin99.2%99.2%29.7%62.0%44.4%
Operating Margin-99.0%-99.0%-7923.5%-2408.1%-1240.2%
Net Margin-82.1%-82.1%-7056.2%-3513.3%-2026.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity————0.25
Current Ratio1.571.57———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-2.7M$-2.7M$-5.0M$-5.6M$-11.7M
Returns
ROE-17.6%-17.6%-35.4%-79.8%-201.8%
Valuation
P/B0.790.790.540.190.08
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth3711.3%3711.3%-78.9%-75.5%—
EPS Growth——85.2%94.6%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -21.5%

Total return

-21.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-1.54 → n/d

Residual

-21.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-21.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.