StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
VSHO11.SA$74.28-0.55%
Fair $74.28+0.0%

VSHO11.SA

VSHO11.SA

Real Estate / REIT - RetailSão Paulo

$74.28

-0.41 (-0.55%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $74.28Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 40/C
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF n/d · quality 29.0/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 75/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

40/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific NAV/AFFO model required: REIT/real-estate targets are disabled until FFO/AFFO/NAV/cap-rate data exists. Missing current price or market-cap data; cannot run NAV/AFFO REIT valuation.
Thesis & Journal · VSHO11.SALocal privado en este navegador · VSHO11.SA
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$0

P/E

3.8x

↓

EV/EBITDA

8.5x

↓

ROE

10.7%

↑

Gross Margin

78.5%

↑

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$74
$67$81

TradingView lightweight chart

VSHO11.SA price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $74.28Periodo -42.9%
Fair value: $74.28

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2024 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+21.8%

FCF CAGR

+85.1%

FCF margin

51.9%

FCF / Net income

0.75x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $33.5M · net income $23.3M · FCF $17.4M

2021-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

78.5%+9.1% pts

Operating margin

54.7%+7.3% pts

Net margin

69.4%+16.4% pts

FCF margin

51.9%+37.1% pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$33.5M$33.5M$28.3M$27.7M$18.6M
Net Income$23.3M$23.3M$20.3M$10.0M$9.8M
EBITDA$18.3M$18.3M$16.0M$17.6M$8.8M
EPS——9.694.774.68
Gross Margin78.5%78.5%79.7%79.2%69.4%
Operating Margin54.7%54.7%56.7%63.7%47.4%
Net Margin69.4%69.4%71.9%36.1%52.9%
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$17.4M$17.4M$15.7M$15.2M$2.7M
Returns
ROE10.7%10.7%9.6%4.8%4.6%
Valuation
P/E3.813.818.1716.4217.06
EV/EBITDA8.508.5010.359.3119.06
P/B0.720.720.790.790.79
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth18.6%18.6%2.1%49.2%—
EPS Growth——103.3%1.8%—
Dividend Yield11.3%11.3%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +16.1%

Total return

+16.1%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

9.69 → n/d

Residual

+4.8%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+11.3%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+4.8%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.