StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
VSL.BO$11.62-2.19%
Fair $11.62+0.0%

VSL.BO

Viram Suvarn Limited

Consumer Cyclical / Luxury GoodsBSE

$11.62

-0.26 (-2.19%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $11.62Fund rank 22/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 39/D
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 15%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $5.9M · quality 30.3/100

Data gap 22/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 16/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

39/100

D

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · VSL.BOLocal privado en este navegador · Viram Suvarn Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.3B

P/E

17.3x

↑

EV/EBITDA

19.9x

↑

ROE

13.5%

↑

Gross Margin

20.3%

↓

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$12
$7$13

TradingView lightweight chart

VSL.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $11.62Periodo +343.3%
Fair value: $11.62

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+12.2%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

18.7%

FCF / Net income

1.46x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $264.8M · net income $34.1M · FCF $49.6M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

20.3%+4.4% pts

Operating margin

17.3%+2.8% pts

Net margin

12.9%-8.4% pts

FCF margin

18.7%+41.3% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$264.8M$264.8M$193.3M$186.8M$187.4M
Net Income$34.1M$34.1M$24.6M$17.9M$39.9M
EBITDA$45.1M$45.1M$33.2M$23.7M$45.5M
EPS2.202.201.591.153.86
Gross Margin20.3%20.3%21.4%14.1%15.9%
Operating Margin17.3%17.3%16.5%11.7%14.5%
Net Margin12.9%12.9%12.7%9.6%21.3%
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$49.6M$49.6M$-1.2M$5.9M$-42.3M
Returns
ROE13.5%13.5%11.2%9.1%21.7%
Valuation
P/E17.3417.345.589.083.67
EV/EBITDA19.9219.9220.6634.1024.05
P/B3.563.563.124.135.96
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth37.0%37.0%3.5%-0.3%—
EPS Growth38.0%38.0%38.1%-70.1%—
Dividend Yield0.6%0.6%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-22.3%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$1.03

Spread vs growth

60.3%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

-10.7%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$1.25

Spread vs growth

48.7%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

-0.9%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$2.01

Spread vs growth

38.9%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +28.1%

Total return

+28.1%

Start / end P/E

5.7x → 5.3x

EPS bridge

1.59 → 2.20

Residual

-2.9%

EPS growth+38.0%
Multiple rerating-7.6%
Dividend+0.6%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-2.9%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.