StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
W2V.AX$0.06-4.62%
Fair $0.06+0.0%

W2V.AX

Way 2 Vat Ltd

Technology / Software - InfrastructureASX

$0.06

-0.00 (-4.62%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.06Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 14/F
F-Score: 2/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 22%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-5.8M · quality 55.7/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 41/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

14/100

F

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -2.9%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · W2V.AXLocal privado en este navegador · Way 2 Vat Ltd
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$16M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-293.7%

↓

Gross Margin

80.0%

↑

Debt/Equity

1.88

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

W2V.AX price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.062Periodo -41.0%
Fair value: $0.062

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+49.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-92.4%

FCF / Net income

0.94x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $6.4M · net income $-6.4M · FCF $-6.0M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

80.0%+3.0% pts

Operating margin

-69.1%+301.1% pts

Net margin

-98.7%+260.8% pts

FCF margin

-92.4%+183.1% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$6.4M$6.4M$4.8M$3.0M$1.9M
Net Income$-6.4M$-6.4M$-5.8M$-6.0M$-6.9M
EBITDA$-4.0M$-4.0M$-4.8M$-5.5M$-6.5M
EPS-0.04-0.04-0.06-0.13-0.35
Gross Margin80.0%80.0%82.0%78.9%77.0%
Operating Margin-69.1%-69.1%-122.5%-208.4%-370.2%
Net Margin-98.7%-98.7%-120.4%-200.0%-359.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.881.88-1.68-2.354.60
Current Ratio0.990.99———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-6.0M$-6.0M$-5.8M$-5.5M$-5.3M
Returns
ROE-293.7%-293.7%274.0%466.1%-2266.7%
Valuation
P/B4.864.86———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth33.2%33.2%60.8%56.8%—
EPS Growth37.8%37.8%51.3%61.9%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -41.0%

Total return

-41.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.06 → -0.04

Residual

-41.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-41.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.