StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
WAAREEINDO.BO$422.65+3.05%
Fair $422.65+0.0%

WAAREEINDO.BO

Indosolar Limited

Technology / SolarBSE

$422.65

+12.50 (+3.05%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $422.65Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 56/C
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 23%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $534.9M · quality 67.7/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 42/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

56/100

C

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · WAAREEINDO.BOLocal privado en este navegador · Indosolar Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$17.6B

P/E

7.1x

↓

EV/EBITDA

6.5x

↓

ROE

85.9%

↑

Gross Margin

42.7%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.01

↓
52-Week Range$423
$165$725

TradingView lightweight chart

WAAREEINDO.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $422.65Periodo -82.2%
Fair value: $422.65

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

7.9%

FCF / Net income

0.22x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $6.80B · net income $2.47B · FCF $534.9M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

42.7%— pts

Operating margin

34.4%— pts

Net margin

36.3%— pts

FCF margin

7.9%— pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$6.80B$6.80B$3.24B——
Net Income$2.47B$2.47B$547.8M$-154.4M$10.81B
EBITDA$2.72B$2.72B$958.8M$-38.6M$10.87B
EPS——13.17-3.71178.36
Gross Margin42.7%42.7%33.0%——
Operating Margin34.4%34.4%20.9%——
Net Margin36.3%36.3%16.9%——
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.010.011.24-7.0858.60
Current Ratio6.706.70———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$534.9M$534.9M$644.8M$-417.3M$-181.1M
Returns
ROE85.9%85.9%135.5%107.5%100489.9%
Valuation
P/E7.137.1324.37—1.80
EV/EBITDA6.476.4714.31—1.29
P/B6.136.1333.04—1241.27
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth109.9%109.9%———
EPS Growth——455.0%-102.1%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +31.7%

Total return

+31.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

13.17 → n/d

Residual

+31.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+31.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.