StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
WBT.AX$7.15+0.56%
Fair $7.15+0.0%

WBT.AX

Weebit Nano Limited

Technology / SemiconductorsASX

$7.15

+0.04 (+0.56%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $7.15Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 35/D
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 24%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-23.4M · quality 67.0/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 33/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

35/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -42.6%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · WBT.AXLocal privado en este navegador · Weebit Nano Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.7B

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-42.6%

↓

Gross Margin

100.0%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.01

↓
52-Week Range$7
$1$8

TradingView lightweight chart

WBT.AX price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $7.150Periodo +37.0%
Fair value: $7.150

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-530.1%

FCF / Net income

0.61x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $4.4M · net income $-38.4M · FCF $-23.4M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

100.0%— pts

Operating margin

-920.3%— pts

Net margin

-870.5%— pts

FCF margin

-530.1%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$4.4M$4.4M$1.0M——
Net Income$-38.4M$-38.4M$-41.2M$-39.0M$-27.7M
EBITDA$-40.2M$-40.2M$-45.1M$-40.1M$-27.4M
EPS-0.19-0.19-0.22-0.22-0.18
Gross Margin100.0%100.0%100.0%——
Operating Margin-920.3%-920.3%-4455.0%——
Net Margin-870.5%-870.5%-4052.4%——
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.010.010.010.000.01
Current Ratio4.224.22———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-23.4M$-23.4M$-25.4M$-20.3M$-22.1M
Returns
ROE-42.6%-42.6%-67.6%-46.3%-51.3%
Valuation
P/B15.8815.887.0611.357.28
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth333.2%333.2%———
EPS Growth12.3%12.3%1.4%-20.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +287.5%

Total return

+287.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.22 → -0.19

Residual

+287.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+287.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.