StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
WBUY$1.00-3.85%
Fair $1.00+0.0%

WBUY

WBUY

Consumer Cyclical / Internet RetailNasdaqCM

$1.00

-0.04 (-3.85%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.00Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 16/F
F-Score: 2/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-7.9M · quality 77.7/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 49/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

16/100

F

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -2.4%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · WBUYLocal privado en este navegador · WBUY
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$5M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-242.2%

↓

Gross Margin

12.0%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.68

↑
52-Week Range$1
$1$10

TradingView lightweight chart

WBUY price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.000Periodo -99.8%
Fair value: $1.000

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-25.0%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-18.9%

FCF / Net income

0.42x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $18.8M · net income $-8.5M · FCF $-3.6M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

12.0%+3.6% pts

Operating margin

-35.1%-18.6% pts

Net margin

-45.3%-30.4% pts

FCF margin

-18.9%-7.1% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$18.8M$18.8M$50.9M$50.8M$44.6M
Net Income$-8.5M$-8.5M$-6.6M$-5.1M$-6.7M
EBITDA$-3.3M$-3.3M$-1.5M$245219.00$-6.0M
EPS——-13.13-12.69-15.43
Gross Margin12.0%12.0%5.0%6.5%8.4%
Operating Margin-35.1%-35.1%-11.4%-2.7%-16.5%
Net Margin-45.3%-45.3%-13.0%-10.1%-14.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.680.680.580.97-0.93
Current Ratio1.151.15———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-3.6M$-3.6M$-7.9M$-8.7M$-5.3M
Returns
ROE-242.2%-242.2%-92.9%-90.1%243.6%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA———105.06—
P/B0.690.691.564.49—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-63.0%-63.0%0.1%14.1%—
EPS Growth——-3.5%17.7%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -80.7%

Total return

-80.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-13.13 → n/d

Residual

-80.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-80.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.