StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
WGT.V$0.38+4.11%
Fair $0.38+0.0%

WGT.V

Westgate Energy Inc.

Energy / Oil & Gas DrillingTSXV

$0.38

+0.01 (+4.11%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.38Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 20/D
F-Score: 1/9
High DebtLow Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 16%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-5.8M · quality 46.3/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 43/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

20/100

D

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 2unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. Debt-to-Equity ratio is 3.96, above the 2.0 threshold ROE is -2.6%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · WGT.VLocal privado en este navegador · Westgate Energy Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$26M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-257.9%

↓

Gross Margin

50.2%

↑

Debt/Equity

3.96

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

WGT.V price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.380Periodo -92.1%
Fair value: $0.380

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-258.3%

FCF / Net income

1.80x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $6.5M · net income $-9.4M · FCF $-16.8M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

50.2%— pts

Operating margin

-47.9%— pts

Net margin

-143.6%— pts

FCF margin

-258.3%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$6.5M$6.5M$3.6M$1.2M—
Net Income$-9.4M$-9.4M$-3.0M$-1.7M—
EBITDA$-5.1M$-5.1M$-1.9M$-1.3M—
EPS——-0.07-0.06-0.00
Gross Margin50.2%50.2%56.6%60.3%—
Operating Margin-47.9%-47.9%-95.9%-139.5%—
Net Margin-143.6%-143.6%-85.1%-143.5%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity3.963.96——-6.04
Current Ratio0.470.47———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-16.8M$-16.8M$-5.8M$-5.4M—
Returns
ROE-257.9%-257.9%-28.1%——
Valuation
P/B7.047.040.91——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth82.7%82.7%197.6%——
EPS Growth——-25.9%-26134.9%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +181.5%

Total return

+181.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.07 → n/d

Residual

+181.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+181.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.