StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
WOLF.V$1.71+1.18%
Fair $1.71+0.0%

WOLF.V

Grey Wolf Animal Health Corp.

Consumer Cyclical / Personal ServicesTSXV

$1.71

+0.02 (+1.18%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.71Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 57/C
F-Score: 7/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 32% · confianza 23%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $2.1M · quality 46.7/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 40/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

57/100

C

Piotroski

7/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · WOLF.VLocal privado en este navegador · Grey Wolf Animal Health Corp.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$59M

P/E

34.2x

↑

EV/EBITDA

11.1x

↑

ROE

5.4%

↑

Gross Margin

53.3%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.83

↑
52-Week Range$2
$1$2

TradingView lightweight chart

WOLF.V price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.710Periodo +85.9%
Fair value: $1.710

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+16.5%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

9.3%

FCF / Net income

2.00x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $35.8M · net income $1.7M · FCF $3.3M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

53.3%+2.2% pts

Operating margin

11.3%+12.9% pts

Net margin

4.6%-6.6% pts

FCF margin

9.3%+12.6% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$35.8M$35.8M$26.8M$25.4M$22.6M
Net Income$1.7M$1.7M$704668.00$609582.00$2.5M
EBITDA$6.9M$6.9M$3.6M$3.2M$10.0M
EPS——0.020.020.15
Gross Margin53.3%53.3%51.3%50.5%51.1%
Operating Margin11.3%11.3%7.1%6.1%-1.6%
Net Margin4.6%4.6%2.6%2.4%11.2%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.830.830.960.400.45
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$3.3M$3.3M$1.2M$2.1M$-764038.00
Returns
ROE5.4%5.4%2.4%2.4%10.5%
Valuation
P/E34.2034.2056.5037.005.26
EV/EBITDA11.1311.1317.027.971.76
P/B1.911.911.380.920.55
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth33.3%33.3%5.6%12.3%—
EPS Growth——0.0%-86.8%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +74.5%

Total return

+74.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.02 → n/d

Residual

+74.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+74.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.