StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
WPAY.ST$1.26-2.33%
Fair $1.26+0.0%

WPAY.ST

Westpay AB

Technology / Software - InfrastructureStockholm

$1.26

-0.03 (-2.33%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.26Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 37/D
F-Score: 7/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 21%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-9.5M · quality 60.7/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 31/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

37/100

D

Piotroski

7/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · WPAY.STLocal privado en este navegador · Westpay AB
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$128M

P/E

31.5x

↑

EV/EBITDA

8.6x

↓

ROE

20.0%

↑

Gross Margin

45.5%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.67

↑
52-Week Range$1
$1$2

TradingView lightweight chart

WPAY.ST price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.260Periodo -79.6%
Fair value: $1.260

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+1.6%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-6.0%

FCF / Net income

-1.05x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $74.0M · net income $4.2M · FCF $-4.4M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

45.5%+15.3% pts

Operating margin

6.2%+18.0% pts

Net margin

5.7%+18.1% pts

FCF margin

-6.0%+21.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$74.0M$74.0M$67.6M$59.7M$70.4M
Net Income$4.2M$4.2M$-6.2M$-27.6M$-8.8M
EBITDA$16.4M$16.4M$5.9M$-8.8M$651000.00
EPS——-0.07-0.41-0.22
Gross Margin45.5%45.5%45.1%27.6%30.2%
Operating Margin6.2%6.2%-2.1%-35.3%-11.7%
Net Margin5.7%5.7%-9.1%-46.2%-12.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.670.671.7712.293.18
Current Ratio0.640.64———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-4.4M$-4.4M$-9.5M$-38.4M$-19.0M
Returns
ROE20.0%20.0%-78.3%-1859.4%-149.2%
Valuation
P/E31.5031.50———
EV/EBITDA8.658.6511.16—107.16
P/B6.096.096.6031.459.49
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth9.4%9.4%13.2%-15.2%—
EPS Growth——83.5%-86.8%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +69.1%

Total return

+69.1%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.07 → n/d

Residual

+69.1%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+69.1%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.