StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
WPC.SI$0.06+1.72%
Fair $0.06+0.0%

WPC.SI

Vallianz Holdings Limited

Industrials / Marine ShippingSES

$0.06

+0.00 (+1.72%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.06Fund rank 24/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 41/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 16%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $381000.00 · quality 37.0/100

Data gap 24/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 16/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

41/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists.
Thesis & Journal · WPC.SILocal privado en este navegador · Vallianz Holdings Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$71M

P/E

5.9x

↓

EV/EBITDA

4.8x

↓

ROE

8.5%

↑

Gross Margin

8.1%

↓

Debt/Equity

1.10

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

WPC.SI price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.059Periodo -99.4%
Fair value: $0.059

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+73.0%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

1.4%

FCF / Net income

0.45x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $332.3M · net income $10.7M · FCF $4.7M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

8.1%+15.1% pts

Operating margin

5.7%+25.7% pts

Net margin

3.2%+6.9% pts

FCF margin

1.4%+13.6% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$332.3M$332.3M$497.9M$149.2M$64.2M
Net Income$10.7M$10.7M$20.4M$-9.4M$-2.4M
EBITDA$42.4M$42.4M$48.9M$5.4M$8.6M
EPS——0.02-0.01-0.00
Gross Margin8.1%8.1%6.0%8.3%-7.0%
Operating Margin5.7%5.7%4.0%1.8%-20.0%
Net Margin3.2%3.2%4.1%-6.3%-3.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.101.101.577.7233.36
Current Ratio0.990.99———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$4.7M$4.7M$-9.6M$381000.00$-7.8M
Returns
ROE8.5%8.5%19.1%-43.1%-47.0%
Valuation
P/E5.905.902.26——
EV/EBITDA4.764.764.1134.5124.54
P/B0.570.570.431.849.96
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-33.3%-33.3%233.7%132.5%—
EPS Growth——318.2%-185.2%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +73.5%

Total return

+73.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.02 → n/d

Residual

+73.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+73.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.