StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
WTO$1.15+11.65%
Fair $1.15+0.0%

WTO

UTime Limited

Technology / Consumer ElectronicsNasdaqCM

$1.15

+0.12 (+11.65%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.15Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 17/F
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-31.7M · quality 49.3/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 16/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

17/100

F

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · WTOLocal privado en este navegador · UTime Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

505.1%

↑

Gross Margin

2.8%

↓

Debt/Equity

-0.52

↓
52-Week Range$1
$1$770

TradingView lightweight chart

WTO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.150Periodo -100.0%
Fair value: $1.150

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-3.1%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-12.6%

FCF / Net income

0.05x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $251.0M · net income $-670.1M · FCF $-31.7M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

2.8%-2.2% pts

Operating margin

-259.0%-247.5% pts

Net margin

-267.0%-252.9% pts

FCF margin

-12.6%-2.9% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$251.0M$251.0M$172.2M$197.6M$275.5M
Net Income$-670.1M$-670.1M$-60.9M$-87.6M$-38.8M
EBITDA$-659.0M$-659.0M$-23.4M$-71.8M$-30.2M
EPS-92964.35-92964.35-19414.54-811259.26-588378.79
Gross Margin2.8%2.8%5.2%15.4%5.0%
Operating Margin-259.0%-259.0%-20.9%-41.3%-11.5%
Net Margin-267.0%-267.0%-35.4%-44.3%-14.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-0.52-0.520.201.730.96
Current Ratio1.021.02———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-31.7M$-31.7M$-374.6M$-27.3M$-26.7M
Returns
ROE505.1%505.1%-16.6%-198.7%-59.8%
Valuation
P/B——0.200.270.31
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth45.8%45.8%-12.9%-28.3%—
EPS Growth-378.8%-378.8%97.6%-37.9%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -99.8%

Total return

-99.8%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-19414.54 → -92964.35

Residual

-99.8%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-99.8%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.