StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
XBOT.V$0.34-4.23%
Fair $0.34+0.0%

XBOT.V

XBOT.V

Technology / Computer HardwareTSXV

$0.34

-0.01 (-4.23%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.34Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 24/D
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-4.1M · quality 47.7/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 15/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

24/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -1.3%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · XBOT.VLocal privado en este navegador · XBOT.V
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$0

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-125.1%

↓

Gross Margin

145.6%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.42

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

XBOT.V price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.340Periodo -70.4%
Fair value: $0.340

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2025 · 4 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

187.1%

FCF / Net income

1.13x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $-2.9M · net income $-4.8M · FCF $-5.4M

2021-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

145.6%+48.8% pts

Operating margin

383.8%+1180.6% pts

Net margin

165.6%+929.8% pts

FCF margin

187.1%+2752.5% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$-2.9M$-2.9M$-7.8M$268032.00$1.1M
Net Income$-4.8M$-4.8M$-8.6M$-9.7M$-8.3M
EBITDA$-5.7M$-5.7M$-12.6M$-4.3M$-9.2M
EPS-0.02-0.02-0.06-0.09-0.12
Gross Margin145.6%145.6%109.4%100.0%96.8%
Operating Margin383.8%383.8%158.4%-616.9%-796.9%
Net Margin165.6%165.6%110.2%-3630.3%-764.2%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.420.420.280.01—
Current Ratio5.865.86———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-5.4M$-5.4M$-4.1M$-1.9M$-27.7M
Returns
ROE-125.1%-125.1%-106.1%-109.2%-36.9%
Valuation
P/B17.5917.592.101.706.67
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth62.7%62.7%-2996.2%-75.2%—
EPS Growth56.4%56.4%38.4%25.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -19.0%

Total return

-19.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.06 → -0.02

Residual

-19.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-19.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.