StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
XPF.L$18.00+1.41%
Fair $18.00+0.0%

XPF.L

XP Factory Plc

Consumer Cyclical / LeisureLSE

$18.00

+0.25 (+1.41%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $18.00Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 26/D
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-2.0M · quality 49.7/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 33/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

26/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 1unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -5.3%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · XPF.LLocal privado en este navegador · XP Factory Plc
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$32M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

376.1x

↑

ROE

-5.3%

↓

Gross Margin

64.0%

↑

Debt/Equity

1.82

↑
52-Week Range$18
$10$19

TradingView lightweight chart

XPF.L price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $18.00Periodo -88.6%
Fair value: $18.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2025 · 4 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+69.6%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-0.1%

FCF / Net income

0.04x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $57.8M · net income $-1.3M · FCF $-55000.0

2021-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

64.0%-8.8% pts

Operating margin

3.3%+9.8% pts

Net margin

-2.2%+10.4% pts

FCF margin

-0.1%+28.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$57.8M$57.8M$22.8M$7.0M
Net Income$-1.3M$-1.3M$-994000.00$-874000.00
EBITDA$8.5M$8.5M$6.5M$2.3M
EPS-0.01-0.01-0.01-0.01
Gross Margin64.0%64.0%64.4%72.7%
Operating Margin3.3%3.3%-16.7%-6.5%
Net Margin-2.2%-2.2%-4.4%-12.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.821.821.180.46
Current Ratio0.680.68——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-55000.00$-55000.00$-5.9M$-2.0M
Returns
ROE-5.3%-5.3%-4.6%-4.0%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA376.11376.11360.121203.43
P/B132.48132.48107.69126.89
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth153.2%153.2%226.9%—
EPS Growth-7.6%-7.6%29.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +38.5%

Total return

+38.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.01 → -0.01

Residual

+38.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+38.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.