StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
XPN.AX$0.01-4.76%
Fair $0.01+0.0%

XPN.AX

XPON Technologies Group Limited

Technology / Software - InfrastructureASX

$0.01

-0.00 (-4.76%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.01Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 14/F
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-3.7M · quality 74.0/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 40/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

14/100

F

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 3.5%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · XPN.AXLocal privado en este navegador · XPON Technologies Group Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$5M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

352.8%

↑

Gross Margin

74.1%

↑

Debt/Equity

-0.55

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

XPN.AX price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.010Periodo -95.0%
Fair value: $0.010

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2024 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-24.7%

FCF / Net income

0.36x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $9.9M · net income $-6.8M · FCF $-2.4M

2021-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

74.1%— pts

Operating margin

-37.5%— pts

Net margin

-68.5%— pts

FCF margin

-24.7%— pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$9.9M$9.9M$15.1M$13.3M—
Net Income$-6.8M$-6.8M$-8.6M$-6.3M—
EBITDA$-6.2M$-6.2M$-8.0M$-6.1M—
EPS-0.02-0.02-0.03-0.02—
Gross Margin74.1%74.1%69.3%64.6%—
Operating Margin-37.5%-37.5%-57.9%-49.9%—
Net Margin-68.5%-68.5%-57.1%-47.3%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-0.55-0.550.010.050.05
Current Ratio0.660.66———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-2.4M$-2.4M$-3.7M$-5.6M—
Returns
ROE352.8%352.8%-210.8%-53.2%—
Valuation
P/B——3.873.32—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-34.5%-34.5%13.2%——
EPS Growth23.0%23.0%-22.0%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +0.0%

Total return

+0.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.03 → -0.02

Residual

+0.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+0.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.